| Bar Code Printer Validation & Verification Solutions from Newbury Data | ||
Related Links |
The problem with Un-Readable Bar Codes
Consider the following:
Approximately 200,000 desktop thermal printers are now purchased each year in Europe. Approximately 90% are purchased to print a bar code label, tag or ticket of some description. Thermal printers vary between small desktop range, mid range and performance range. Print volumes also vary based on the range purchased.
| Approximate Breakdown | ||||
| Printer | Market Share | Printer Unit Sales | Labels Per Day | Labels Per Year |
| Desktop | 45% | 90,000 | 100 | 2,340,000,000 |
| Mid Range | 45% | 90,000 | 300 | 7,020,000,000 |
| Performance Range | 10% | 20,000 | 500 | 2,600,000,000 |
| Total Number of Labels Per Year | 11,960,000,000 | |||
| All figures are approximate | Approximately 90% include a barcode | 10,764,000,000 | ||
Laser or inkjet printers alert you on the printer’s LCD panel and/or on screen software utility that the printer has low toner or ink that will effect print quality.
Thermal printers do not tell you that:
which all effect print quality, and will no doubt print unreadable bar codes.
As these issues occur every day it is plausible to assume that of the total number of labels printed each year that include bar codes, a percentage of them are not readable. Even if the percentage was only 0.1%, the number of unreadable barcodes printed per year would be 1,076,400.
The fact is that probably as many as just 1% of all bar codes labels fail (10,764,000), causing serious and significant bottle necks and manual intervention in automated systems designed to improve processes and gain return on investments by reading bar code data streams.
This volume has been fairly consistent and growing since Y2K and the increased awareness and use of thermal printers with the new systems that were implemented at the time. This means that on average there are approximately over 50 million unreadable barcodes produced each year in Europe alone.
Problem example
A major parcel carrier has approximately 3000 customers, in which a low cost thermal printer is supplied to print the carriers bar coded label. The label contains a bar code which is scanned by the fixed position scanners used in the HUB (central sorting depot) to read and send the parcel to the required delivery vehicle position. When the fixed position scanner can not read the label bar code, the parcel is automatically re-routed to a re-work area to be re-labelled with a good (“readable”) bar code label.
Each night approximately 2000 labels are reprinted. Whilst some are re-printed because they are applied around corners of the parcel or are covered by packing straps making them unreadable, the vast majority are un-readable as the thermal printer printhead has blown elements, meaning that all bar code labels printed by the printer will be un-readable.
The re-work area contains 8 workstations, each workstation contains a PC and thermal printer to re-print un-readable labels. However, on one particular day, 6 (75%) of the 8 printers had printhead errors, meaning that of the 2000 labels that had to be re-printed, 1500 came back to be re-worked. Subsequently 1200 of them came back, and so on until it was soon realised the nature of the problem, including the cost of recovery.
Summary
Providing on-line bar code validators such as Newbury Data’s SecurPrint or Printronix ODV overcomes the end user problem of un-readable bar codes and associated recovery costs.
Value Added Solution: On-Line Bar Code Validation
Bar Code Validation
What comes first for automated systems, the INPUT or the OUTPUT?
Therefore, is the importance of OUTPUT any less important than INPUT, or is it more critical as the system designed around INPUT is now less valuable as the system does not read the bar code data that is suffering from mis reads, incorrect or costly manual data entry, with the potential to cause bottle necks in the system or customer related problems. With this mind Newbury Data now provides a range of bar code validation solution to ensure the lowest cost items in the system do not cause the highest number of problems seen in today’s automated identification systems.
JUSTIFICATION
Q. What is the most common application for label printers?
Answer: Bar Codes
Q. What is the most important error condition that a printer can not tell you?
Q. What is the most important error condition not reported by front panel of the printer or via the network?
Q. What could or does stop your expensive automated process or production lines?
Q. Why might you receive compliance fines?
Q. Why might you loose customers?
Answer: “No Read”, “Miss Read”, “Wrong Data”, Wrong Symbology” or “Badly Printed” Bar Codes
What happens to my system when bad bar codes are printed?
The highest level of deemed importance and cost per average system should offer the fewest failures, whilst the lowest deemed important hardware item, I.e.; Label Printer, Labels and/or Ribbons, are seen as the lowest cost items but offer the highest number of points of failure. Incorrect settings of your printer, no knowledge of printhead life, incorrect selection of label and/or ribbon, or badly printed bar code labels offer the highest number of system failures.
|
||
|
||
Thermal printers and labels are seen as the lowest individual cost items, with the least importance in the whole scheme of the system architecture. But what is the cost per failure at this level?. Is cost based on “cost of recovery”, “cost of recovery and compliance fine” or “cost of recovery and loss of business or customer”?. Is the real cost of “no read barcode” or badly printed “barcode label” failure really identified and addressed correctly? Why expect to pay so little for products that can cause so many failures, whilst still expecting maximum return on investment?.
Reasons why you are not guaranteed a perfect bar code every time
Available Solutions
1. Bar Code Validation Solution: Newbury Data SecurPrint
2. Bar Code Validation & Verification Solution: Printronix ODV (Online Data Validator)
1. SecurPrint: Identify “No Read” Barcodes and “Reprint” Them!
Newbury Data’s technical expertise in developing thermal printing applications has helped many of the UK’s leading companies create “best of breed” solutions. SecurPrint is another “best of breed” solution and is designed for Citizen & Toshiba TEC and Zebra thermal printers.
If the need to identify and reprint “No Read” bar codes at time of original print is required then SecurPrint is the answer. If printing “unreadable bar codes” is acceptable to you, why spend a fortune installing an automated data capture solution in the first place?
Newbury Data’s SecurPrint System is a cost efficient system designed to ensure that “No Read” bar codes are identified and eliminated before being applied or accepted in to a client’s application, applications that could cause:
2. Printronix T5000 Online Data Validation System
The T5000r Online Data Validation System (ODV) guarantees that bar codes are scannable, offering a complete bar code compliant solution.
Benefits
Features
Professional Services
In addition to Bar Code Validation Solutions, Newbury Data is also able to offer our partners the following professional services: